From Ocean Teacher Library

Jump to: navigation, search
Platform Type Standards for Marine Data

Contents

Background

In January, 2008, the IOC and JCOMM convened a workshop entitled the IODE/JCOMM Forum on Oceanographic Data Management and Exchange Standards (IOC Workshop Rept. 206), to consider selected principal issues on establishing marine data standards, with the goal of furthering marine data interoperability. In particular the aim of the workshop was to get broad agreement and commitment to adopt a number of standards related to ocean data management and exchange, thereby assembling not only the agreed conditions by which we operate, but in fact enact these agreements in the participants' respective organizations.

Standards Recommendation

Mr. Parner (ICES) and Mr. Lowry (UK BODC) led both the Platform Name and Platform Type discussions, which are summarized and concatenated below. In view of the fact that no positive selection of a standard was made, and the very open-ended way that the discussion ended, this article and the companion article Platform Name Standards for Marine Data are both considered incomplete at this time, and will be amended and updated as further material is developed.

Mr. Lowry defined the term “platform” as “Vehicles, objects, structures or organisms capable of bearing sensors, instruments or tools for the collection of physical, chemical, geological or biological samples”. A “platform instance” is a physical manifestation of a platform. A “platform category” is a term used to label a group of platform instances that possess a common set of attributes.

They then considered the platform lists available for discussion:

Both speakers noted strengths and weaknesses in these systems, and made it clear that no easy consolidation or reconciliation of them is at hand.

Mr. Lowry proposed the following way forward:

  • Repair L061 (vocabulary of SeaDataNet platform classes);
  • Open up L061 content governance using the SeaVOX facilities of SeaDataNet
  • Establish mappings to lists in heavy community use (MGD77, WMO, USNODC)
  • Establish mappings to platform instance lists (e.g. GCMD) to establish semantic bridge to metadata populated using instances

Decisions

  • The meeting did not identify a recommended standard;
  • It was agreed that ICES and US NODCs should continue the maintenance of their

current lists;

  • It was agreed that Mr. Lowry should repair L061, open content governance using SeaVox, establish mapping to other lists and mappings to instances (such as ICES)


Subsections of this Article

No subsections available

Information about this article

Short title: Platform Types

Description: none

Expertise level: beginner

Author: Murray.Brown

Approval status: approved

Approved by: Murray.Brown

Last change: 2011-11-24

Subsection of: Marine Data Standards

Contact

If you have any direct comments or suggestions for the author of this page then please feel free to send an email to the author (listed above). For discussions on this page please use the discussions page.,   

This page was last modified on 24 November 2011, at 14:33.This page has been accessed 1,282 times.
SemanticTreeview close tree

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License